How Your Marketing Communications are Consumed, and Why it Matters More than We Admit

Consumers don’t see your ad in isolation.

They don’t hear a radio commercial with a script in front of them, scanning the words like it’s a Disney Read-Along from when I was a kid. “You will know it’s time to turn the page…”

Drivers – who in this context are potential consumers and purchasers of your brand who just happen to be in a car – don’t stop and focus on each billboard they pass. It’s just another piece of information to process (or ignore) among many when you’re behind the wheel.

Ads in print appear alongside articles and other advertisements. On TV ads come in clusters. Even targeted digital ads are part of the wider online experience and not a natural focus point for the attention of browsers skimming news, videos or the socials.

And this is obvious. We all inherently know it.

But too many marketers forget this basic truth when they create a campaign. And this isolationist approach to consumer messaging diminishes your end product. If you haven’t considered the environment in which the message is being received by the intended audience, you haven’t done your job properly.

Our role in writing, crafting and delivering marketing communications is to make it clear and memorable. Be relevant. Be concise.

Be efficient with the extraordinarily limited time you have to make an impact.

Here’s a tactic I use when presenting radio scripts to clients: I read it aloud, but I don’t give them a copy. No reading, just listen.

Then I encourage them to do the same, even if just to a business partner. This gets them a step closer to understanding how the ad will work.

Does it make sense when you simply listen? Is the impact there? Do the words fall in a way that sounds right? (And from the radio advertising practitioner inside me: Would it be stronger if they didn’t, creating a jarring effect for listeners?)

In truth, media professionals are understandably reluctant to tell a client their ad or campaign will be battling for attention.

But as professionals we should recognise the situation, and do all we can to ensure it is as effective as it can possibly be within any existing constraints, regulations and parameters. Which means considering how the communications will be consumed.

If we can’t do that much, we risk poor returns for clients.

Consumers don’t see your ad in isolation. Use that knowledge to make what you create better.

The Great Myth of Engagement

Engagement is to 2017-18 as integration was before it, and synergy before that.

A dangerously hollow buzzword.

Somehow it gains traction in the business community and the momentum quickly becomes unstoppable. FOMO kicks in hard as nobody wants to be left behind.

Here lies the problem: most organisations don’t have a clear, agreed definition for engagement. Let alone any metrics by which to measure its effectiveness.

The new Deloitte report Shared Stories: building brand in the digital age states 18% of marketing professionals rate ‘Building Customer Engagement’ as a top marketing objective.

This is separate to ‘Increasing Sales and Revenue’ and ‘Increasing Market Share’.

So what exactly is this engagement? What strategy do these businesses have to convert engagement into sales and revenue? How does it move a light or non-user into someone who will buy the brand?

In an age where every company looks to extract maximum value from every department – revenue centres vs cost centres – it’s startling to see some marketing professionals using limited budgets to chase a nebulous concept.

With over 55 million views on YouTube alone, we all loved The Man Your Man Could Smell Like.

We watched, laughed, shared and watched again. Was it engaging? Absolutely. Have I – or anyone I know – ever bought Old Spice? No.

Engagement was high. Brand awareness spiked. But that’s worth nothing if consumers are still walking past it in the supermarket as they pick up their Nivea, Dove or Lynx.

Denying Access to your Product is Dumb

The FIFA World Cup 2018 is taking place in Russia. But FIFA is attempting to stop highlights appearing on Twitter, sending a takedown notice to at least one account.

TV rights drive FIFA’s income from the tournament so it is predictably protective.

But is it too protective?

Football fans will be consuming the games anyway.

FIFA is effectively keeping out non-users.

Quick highlights on social media offer a point of engagement to non-users. Which may convert them to heavier users, which in turn adds more value to those sweet, sweet TV rights.

Every business wants to go viral. Except, apparently, FIFA.

Insert own goal joke here.